The ‘worry of lacking out’ is a timeless human situation repeated for eons and ingrained in human DNA. But, it appears to carry a particular place within the mining business.
A psychological situation that extends from the small-scale investor to the highest canine at a significant mining agency.
That’s why M&A exercise can provide a helpful barometer for gauging our place in a broad commodity-wide cycle… It’s the size judging general market hubris or lack thereof.
However the first, maybe most essential level… a single giant deal (e.g., BHP’s latest bid for Anglo) shouldn’t trigger concern.
In different phrases, the formation of a significant high.
You see, virtually 20 years in the past, BHP was in pursuit of one other main mining company.
Like Anglo, BHP was after a longtime, multi-commodity producer with a deep historical past of mining… The corporate within the majors’ crosshairs was WMC, formally often known as Western Mining Company.
Based in 1933, WMC constructed a legacy of discovering world-class deposits and bringing them into manufacturing.
This was one of many nation’s most iconic firms, pivotal in making Australia’s mining business world well-known.
It found one in all Australia’s largest mines, the enormous copper-gold Olympic Dam deposit in South Australia. Since its discovery in 1976, this venture has continued to ship wealthy rewards to its house owners.
However in 2005, BHP paid a lofty A$9.5 billion for WMC and its basket of property. That’s equal to round A$15.4 billion in right now’s cash.
We’re nonetheless a good distance from the highest
Because the WMC acquisition confirmed, 2005 was removed from a market peak. In actual fact, commodities continued to rally for one more six years into 2011.
Like right now, 2005 was the start of one thing a lot bigger.
But, the sheer variety of M&A offers happening can measure the market’s boiling level… That occurred on two events during the last commodity cycle:
Supply: Mergers, Acquisitions & Alliances
Right here, blue bars signify the variety of offers; the brown line measures their general worth. I’ve annotated the M&A peaks, that are proven as inexperienced circles.
As you possibly can see, 2007 marked a lofty 12 months for acquisitions.
That efficiently pinpointed a high in commodity markets earlier than the 2008 subprime disaster took maintain. Commodity costs fell sharply… M&A exercise cooled.
That was solely momentary. As you possibly can see, a second inexperienced circle reveals the subsequent peak in M&A exercise over 2010-12.
This was a very spectacular time for commodity markets.
M&A on steroids
The 2010 to 2012 interval would mark the finale of one in all historical past’s most euphoric commodity booms.
As a geologist working in Zambia for Equinox Minerals on the time, I had a singular on-the-ground perspective.
In early 2011, Equinox was below a takeover bid provide from the Chinese language-owned mining conglomerate MMG. A number of weeks later, Barrick trumped MMG with a $7.3 billion takeover provide.
That was sufficient for Barrick to seize maintain of Equinox’s copper property.
Symbolically, the deal befell only a few weeks after copper reached its all-time excessive of round $4.48/lb in February 2011. Barrick had captured its prize, however the pleasure was short-lived.
Because the above graph confirmed, M&A exercise was feverish alongside traditionally excessive commodity costs.
However as some might bear in mind, the push to accumulate tasks and outbid rivals got here at an important price.
Simply two years later, Barrick, the world’s largest gold miner on the time, suffered a humiliating $4.2 billion write-down on the Equinox deal.
Barrick’s CEO admitted in shareholder communications that the mining large grossly overpaid in its race to seize this Zambian copper asset.
A number of months later, the corporate’s CEO was given the boot.
Clearly, mining executives are simply as susceptible to overpaying because the on a regular basis investor.
And Barrick was removed from alone on this race to the underside…
In 2013, the CEO of mining large Rio Tinto, Tom Albanese, was fired after the corporate wrote off greater than $14 billion following a sequence of poorly timed acquisitions.
BHP, Rio Tinto, Glencore, Barrick, and plenty of others participated within the M&A folly that befell on the peak of the final mining increase.
Undoubtedly, the subsequent era of mining executives is destined to repeat the identical errors—as are the legions of traders.
However what does BHP’s newest transfer on Anglo sign? Is it a measured takeover try akin to BHPs 2005 acquisition of WMC?
Or does it signify a market stuffed with hubris, counterbids and extreme premiums?
Clearly, it’s the previous. We’re nonetheless removed from a 2011-style high.
Regardless of elevated commodity costs, junior mining shares proceed to commerce round multi-year lows.
This can be a key cause traders needs to be this sector from a price perspective.
James Cooper runs the commodities funding service Diggers and Drillers . You may also observe him on X (Twitter) @JCooperGeo